32.3
56.5 %
93.9 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 56.5%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 6.2 | 8.2 | 5.0 | 8.8 | 9.2 | 10.8 | 9.8 | 58.0 | 56.0% | 0.9 |
| Article, other | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 1.5 | NA | 0.8 | 1.5 | 8.4 | 54.5% | 0.9 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.7 | NA | 0.7 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Conference paper, other | NA | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | NA | 0.3 | NA | 2.5 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Book | 0.3 | NA | 0.8 | NA | 1.0 | NA | NA | 2.2 | 0.0% | 0.4 |
| Anthology (editor) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.8 | NA | 1.5 | NA | 3.3 | 8.3 | 0.0% | 0.1 |
| Chapter in book | 17.2 | 22.3 | 7.8 | 10.2 | 11.2 | 4.1 | 15.8 | 88.8 | 0.0% | 0.3 |
| Article, book review | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3.0 | NA | NA | 3.0 | 66.7% | 0.0 |
| Report | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 8.7 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 10 | 16 | 11 | 17 | 16 | 21 | 23 | 114 | 62.3% | 1 |
| Article, other | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | NA | 2 | 2 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Conference paper, other | NA | 1 | 2 | 1 | NA | 1 | NA | 5 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Book | 1 | NA | 2 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Anthology (editor) | 3 | 3 | 3 | NA | 2 | NA | 4 | 15 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Chapter in book | 23 | 24 | 10 | 17 | 16 | 6 | 23 | 119 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Article, book review | NA | NA | NA | NA | 3 | NA | NA | 3 | 66.7% | 0 |
| Report | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 24 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 1 | NA | 1 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 5.3 | 10.3 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 46.9% |
| 2015 | 4.3 | 10.9 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 34.6% |
| 2016 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 3.2 | 80.2% |
| 2017 | 5.3 | 23.6 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 18.8% |
| 2018 | 5.2 | 22.2 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 9.5% |
| Total | 24.2 | 71.9 | 3.0 | 8.7 | 35.8% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 9.3 | 0.94 | 1.2 | 13.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 10.8 | 1.01 | 1.7 | 15.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 12.7 | 0.86 | 1.2 | 9.1% |
| 2017-2019 | 14.6 | 1.02 | 1.2 | 8.5% |
| Total | 23.8 | 0.99 | 2.5 | 10.4% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 40.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 9.3 | 1.08 | 2.6 | 27.8% |
| 2015-2017 | 10.3 | 1.07 | 3.0 | 29.6% |
| 2016-2018 | 12.2 | 1.01 | 2.3 | 18.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 14.1 | 0.99 | 3.2 | 22.6% |
| 2018-2020 | 16.8 | 0.98 | 3.7 | 22.1% |
| Total | 30.5 | 1.04 | 7.9 | 26.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 21 | 2 | 9.5% | 7 | 33.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 26 | 4 | 15.4% | 12 | 46.2% |
| 2016-2018 | 27 | 6 | 22.2% | 11 | 40.7% |
| 2017-2019 | 31 | 9 | 29.0% | 11 | 35.5% |
| 2018-2020 | 37 | 12 | 32.4% | 18 | 48.6% |
| Total | 69 | 16 | 23.2% | 30 | 43.5% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 59.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.4 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| United States | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Slovenia | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Spain | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Republic of Serbia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Taiwan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Rwanda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Uganda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute | Institute | Sweden | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.9 |
| Jönköping University College | University College | Sweden | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.5 |
| Lund University | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Chinese Academy of Sciences | Institute | China | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Swedish Environmental Research Institute | Institute | Sweden | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Chalmers University of Technology | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| University of Cambridge | University | United Kingdom | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Institute for Developmental and Strategic Analysis (IRSA) | Institute | Slovenia | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Beijing Normal University | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Chinese University of Hong Kong | University | China | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| University of Cincinnati | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Stockholm School of Economics | University College | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Chongqing Technology and Business University | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| CHONGQING UNIVERSITY | University | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Edinburgh Napier University | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Federal University of São João del-Rei (UFSJ) | University | Brazil | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Karlstad University | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Nottingham | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Oulu | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Trento | University | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) | Institute | Sweden | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona | University | Spain | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Ctr Entrepreneurship & Spatial Econ CEnSE | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Eindhoven University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| KMV forum AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Nanjing Agricultural University (NAU) | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| National Taiwan University | University | Taiwan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Research Institute For Industrial Economics | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish Ctr Innovat & Qual Built Environm | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum | Other | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Umeå University | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Niš | University | Republic of Serbia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Northumbria at Newcastle | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Warsaw | University | Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| NA | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| China Agricultural University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Delft University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Hunan University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Karolinska Institutet | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Technical University of Berlin | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Chinese Academy of Sciences | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Melbourne | University | Australia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Pennsylvania | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Auburn University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Decision Research | Institute | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Free University of Brussels | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Network Water & Sanitat NETWAS | NA | Uganda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| PE Teknik & Arkitektur AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Stockholm International Water Institute | Other | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| United Nations Dev Programme UNDP | NA | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Oregon | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Rwanda | University | Rwanda | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| PE Accounting | Company | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Swedish Research Council for sustainable development (Formas) | Other Public | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Södertörns University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Gävleborg County Council | Other health services | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Swedish Defence Research Agency | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Assoc Rural Dev Thuringia | NA | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 2015 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 43.8% |
| 2016 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 63.6% |
| 2018 | 20 | 15 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 75.0% |
| 2019 | 23 | 16 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 69.6% |
| 2020 | 26 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 76.9% |
| Total | 132 | 78 | 14 | 28 | 24 | 12 | 54 | 59.1% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 6.3 | 102.2 | 16.1 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2015 | 9.2 | 127.6 | 13.9 | 0.8 | 9.1% |
| 2016 | 7.1 | 45.9 | 6.4 | 1.7 | 23.4% |
| 2017 | 10.3 | 140.8 | 13.6 | 1.0 | 9.7% |
| 2018 | 7.0 | 45.6 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 11.3 | 55.9 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 11.1% |
| 2020 | 10.5 | 29.5 | 2.8 | 2.0 | 19.0% |
| Total | 61.7 | 547.3 | 8.9 | 7.8 | 12.6% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 18.9 | 1.64 | 3.6 | 18.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 22.9 | 1.89 | 5.2 | 22.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 22.6 | 1.35 | 2.8 | 12.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 25.7 | 1.62 | 4.4 | 17.0% |
| Total | 44.6 | 1.63 | 7.9 | 17.8% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 18.8 | 1.09 | 7.4 | 39.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 23.3 | 1.06 | 9.7 | 41.5% |
| 2016-2018 | 22.6 | 1.20 | 10.2 | 45.0% |
| 2017-2019 | 26.3 | 1.16 | 10.5 | 39.8% |
| 2018-2020 | 26.0 | 1.35 | 11.5 | 44.3% |
| Total | 54.6 | 1.21 | 22.5 | 41.2% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 37 | 0 | 0.0% | 9 | 24.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 46 | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 28.3% |
| 2016-2018 | 43 | 0 | 0.0% | 13 | 30.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 50 | 0 | 0.0% | 14 | 28.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 55 | 0 | 0.0% | 23 | 41.8% |
| Total | 110 | 0 | 0.0% | 37 | 33.6% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 37 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
