Overview

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

32.3

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

56.5 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

93.9 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 56.5%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 6.2 8.2 5.0 8.8 9.2 10.8 9.8 58.0 56.0% 0.9
Article, other 1.0 1.0 2.7 1.5 NA 0.8 1.5 8.4 54.5% 0.9
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA 0.7 NA 0.7 100.0% 1.0
Conference paper, other NA 1.0 0.6 0.5 NA 0.3 NA 2.5 0.0% 0.0
Book 0.3 NA 0.8 NA 1.0 NA NA 2.2 0.0% 0.4
Anthology (editor) 1.3 1.3 0.8 NA 1.5 NA 3.3 8.3 0.0% 0.1
Chapter in book 17.2 22.3 7.8 10.2 11.2 4.1 15.8 88.8 0.0% 0.3
Article, book review NA NA NA NA 3.0 NA NA 3.0 66.7% 0.0
Report 1.0 0.3 2.0 0.7 2.3 1.5 0.8 8.7 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA 1.0 NA 1.0 1.0 NA 1.0 4.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 10 16 11 17 16 21 23 114 62.3% 1
Article, other 1 1 4 2 NA 2 2 12 58.3% 1
Conference paper, peer review NA NA NA NA NA 1 NA 1 100.0% 1
Conference paper, other NA 1 2 1 NA 1 NA 5 0.0% 0
Book 1 NA 2 NA 1 NA NA 4 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 3 3 3 NA 2 NA 4 15 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 23 24 10 17 16 6 23 119 0.0% 0
Article, book review NA NA NA NA 3 NA NA 3 66.7% 0
Report 3 2 2 3 6 6 2 24 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA 1 NA 1 1 NA 1 4 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 5.3 10.3 1.9 2.5 46.9%
2015 4.3 10.9 2.5 1.5 34.6%
2016 4.0 4.8 1.2 3.2 80.2%
2017 5.3 23.6 4.4 1.0 18.8%
2018 5.2 22.2 4.2 0.5 9.5%
Total 24.2 71.9 3.0 8.7 35.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 9.3 0.94 1.2 13.5%
2015-2017 10.8 1.01 1.7 15.3%
2016-2018 12.7 0.86 1.2 9.1%
2017-2019 14.6 1.02 1.2 8.5%
Total 23.8 0.99 2.5 10.4%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 7 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 40.8%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 9.3 1.08 2.6 27.8%
2015-2017 10.3 1.07 3.0 29.6%
2016-2018 12.2 1.01 2.3 18.8%
2017-2019 14.1 0.99 3.2 22.6%
2018-2020 16.8 0.98 3.7 22.1%
Total 30.5 1.04 7.9 26.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 22 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 49.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 21 2 9.5% 7 33.3%
2015-2017 26 4 15.4% 12 46.2%
2016-2018 27 6 22.2% 11 40.7%
2017-2019 31 9 29.0% 11 35.5%
2018-2020 37 12 32.4% 18 48.6%
Total 69 16 23.2% 30 43.5%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 59.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
China 9 9 0 0 0 2.4
United Kingdom 5 5 0 0 0 2.0
United States 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
Slovenia 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Germany 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Taiwan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Rwanda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute Institute Sweden 11 10 1 0 0 5.9
Jönköping University College University College Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 2.1
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.5
Lund University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.4
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute China 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
Linköping University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.1
Swedish Environmental Research Institute Institute Sweden 3 2 1 0 0 1.1
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
University of Cambridge University United Kingdom 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
Institute for Developmental and Strategic Analysis (IRSA) Institute Slovenia 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Beijing Normal University University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
Chinese University of Hong Kong University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
University of Cincinnati University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Stockholm School of Economics University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Chongqing Technology and Business University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
CHONGQING UNIVERSITY University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Edinburgh Napier University University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Federal University of São João del-Rei (UFSJ) University Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Karlstad University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Nottingham University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Oulu University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Trento University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) Institute Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona University Spain 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Ctr Entrepreneurship & Spatial Econ CEnSE NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
KMV forum AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Nanjing Agricultural University (NAU) University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
National Taiwan University University Taiwan 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Research Institute For Industrial Economics Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Agency for Growth Policy Analysis Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Ctr Innovat & Qual Built Environm NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Swedish Entrepreneurship Forum Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Umeå University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Niš University Republic of Serbia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Northumbria at Newcastle University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Warsaw University Poland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
NA NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
China Agricultural University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Hunan University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Melbourne University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Pennsylvania University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Auburn University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Decision Research Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Free University of Brussels University Belgium 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Network Water & Sanitat NETWAS NA Uganda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
PE Teknik & Arkitektur AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Stockholm International Water Institute Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
United Nations Dev Programme UNDP NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Oregon University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Rwanda University Rwanda 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
PE Accounting Company Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Swedish Research Council for sustainable development (Formas) Other Public Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Södertörns University College University College Sweden 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Gävleborg County Council Other health services Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Swedish Defence Research Agency Institute Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Assoc Rural Dev Thuringia NA Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1

Open Access

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 13 2 0 1 1 0 11 15.4%
2015 16 7 1 0 6 0 9 43.8%
2016 12 4 0 0 3 1 8 33.3%
2017 22 14 0 7 5 2 8 63.6%
2018 20 15 4 3 6 2 5 75.0%
2019 23 16 4 7 1 4 7 69.6%
2020 26 20 5 10 2 3 6 76.9%
Total 132 78 14 28 24 12 54 59.1%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 6.3 102.2 16.1 0.0 0.0%
2015 9.2 127.6 13.9 0.8 9.1%
2016 7.1 45.9 6.4 1.7 23.4%
2017 10.3 140.8 13.6 1.0 9.7%
2018 7.0 45.6 6.5 1.0 14.3%
2019 11.3 55.9 5.0 1.2 11.1%
2020 10.5 29.5 2.8 2.0 19.0%
Total 61.7 547.3 8.9 7.8 12.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 9 (full counted) publications with good Scopus coverage (at least 75.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 18.9 1.64 3.6 18.9%
2015-2017 22.9 1.89 5.2 22.9%
2016-2018 22.6 1.35 2.8 12.2%
2017-2019 25.7 1.62 4.4 17.0%
Total 44.6 1.63 7.9 17.8%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 18.8 1.09 7.4 39.5%
2015-2017 23.3 1.06 9.7 41.5%
2016-2018 22.6 1.20 10.2 45.0%
2017-2019 26.3 1.16 10.5 39.8%
2018-2020 26.0 1.35 11.5 44.3%
Total 54.6 1.21 22.5 41.2%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 35 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 88.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 37 0 0.0% 9 24.3%
2015-2017 46 0 0.0% 13 28.3%
2016-2018 43 0 0.0% 13 30.2%
2017-2019 50 0 0.0% 14 28.0%
2018-2020 55 0 0.0% 23 41.8%
Total 110 0 0.0% 37 33.6%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 37 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 90.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row